illiteracy: inhibit democracy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
inhibit democracy 1.00
threaten democracy 0.87
be danger to democratic society 0.81
affect freedom 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(inequality, threaten democracy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect freedom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, affect freedom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect freedom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(inequality, threaten democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, threaten democracy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, affect freedom)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(inequality, threaten democracy)