illiteracy: be danger to democratic society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be danger to democratic society 1.00
be danger to society 0.92
be in society 0.87
be important in society 0.85
threaten democracy 0.85
be good for society 0.83
exist in society 0.83
be problem for society 0.83
be present in society 0.83
inhibit democracy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in society)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for society)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in society)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be present in society)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(inequality, threaten democracy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in society)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(inequality, be in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(inequality, be good for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inequality, exist in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(inequality, threaten democracy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, threaten democracy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(inequality, be present in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(inequality, be present in society)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inequality, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be danger to society)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to society)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, inhibit democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(inequality, be in society)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in society)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for society)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in society)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, be present in society)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(inequality, threaten democracy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)