illusion: be valuable to psychologists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reality
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, trick
Weight: 0.56
, effect
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings space time
Weight: 0.43
, normality
Weight: 0.40
, myth
Weight: 0.34
, truth
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable to psychologists 1.00
be important in psychology 0.76
be vital tools for developmental researchers 0.76
be vital tools for researchers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(illusion, be valuable to psychologists)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in psychology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(illusion, be important in psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in psychology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(illusion, be valuable to psychologists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be valuable to psychologists) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)