implant: have replaced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.69
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.62
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings artificial heart
Weight: 0.68
, contact lens
Weight: 0.65
, screw
Weight: 0.59
, plate
Weight: 0.57
, stent
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
have replaced 1.00
is replaced 0.99
need replaced 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stent, need replaced)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stent, is replaced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stent, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(stent, is replaced)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stent, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stent, need replaced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(implant, have replaced)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(implant, is replaced)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(implant, is replaced)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(implant, need replaced)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(implant, need replaced)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(implant, is replaced)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(implant, need replaced)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(implant, is replaced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(implant, have replaced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(stent, is replaced)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(stent, need replaced)