implant: need replaced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.69
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.62
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings artificial heart
Weight: 0.68
, contact lens
Weight: 0.65
, screw
Weight: 0.59
, plate
Weight: 0.57
, stent
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
need replaced 1.00
have replaced 0.97
is replaced 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stent, need replaced)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stent, is replaced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stent, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stent, need replaced)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stent, is replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(stent, is replaced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(implant, need replaced)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(implant, is replaced)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(implant, is replaced)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(implant, have replaced)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(implant, is replaced)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implant, have replaced)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(implant, have replaced)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(implant, have replaced)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(implant, is replaced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(implant, need replaced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(stent, is replaced)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(implant, need replaced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(stent, need replaced)