inclusion: be used in dating process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in dating process 1.00
be used in relative dating process 0.93
be used in process 0.84
be used in relative process 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in relative process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in relative process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(inclusion, be used in relative dating process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in relative process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be used in dating process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(inclusion, be used in dating process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inclusion, be used in dating process)