income: be called fixed income

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called fixed income 1.00
be called income 0.92
is fixed 0.88
be measured on income statement 0.81
be taxed at lower rate 0.76
is tax 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(income tax, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(income, be called fixed income)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income, be measured on income statement)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, is fixed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(income, be measured on income statement)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(income, be called fixed income)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be called fixed income)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)