income: be taxed at lower rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taxed at lower rate 1.00
be taxed 0.90
is taxed 0.90
be exempt from tax 0.80
be verified for subsidized rates 0.79
be lower than gross 0.79
is tax 0.77
tax 0.77
be called fixed income 0.76
be determined for 2008 tax rebates 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(allowance, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(allowance, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(allowance, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(allowance, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(income tax, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be taxed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(income, is taxed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(income, be taxed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income, is taxed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be called fixed income)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(income, is taxed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income, be called fixed income)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income, tax)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(income, be lower than gross)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(income, be lower than gross)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(income, be lower than gross)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(income, be lower than gross)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(income, tax)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be exempt from tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(income, be called fixed income)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(income, tax)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(income, be verified for subsidized rates)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, tax)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(income, be exempt from tax)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income, be exempt from tax)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income, is taxed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(income, be exempt from tax)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(income, be called fixed income)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(income, is tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(income, be verified for subsidized rates)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(income, be verified for subsidized rates)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(income, be verified for subsidized rates)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(allowance, is taxed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(allowance, is taxed)