income: be taxed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taxed 1.00
is taxed 1.00
be taxed at lower rate 0.90
be exempt from tax 0.83
is tax 0.79
tax 0.79
be determined for 2008 tax rebates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(allowance, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be taxed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(allowance, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(allowance, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(allowance, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(income tax, is tax)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(income, be taxed)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(income, is taxed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income, is taxed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income, is taxed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(income, is taxed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be exempt from tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(income, tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(income, tax)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income, tax)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(income, be exempt from tax)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income, be exempt from tax)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(income, is tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(income, be exempt from tax)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(income, be determined for 2008 tax rebates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be taxed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(allowance, is taxed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income, be taxed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(allowance, is taxed)