increase: be in population

Related concepts

Parents	amount Weight: 0.66 , benefit Weight: 0.64 , hike Weight: 0.59 , measure Weight: 0.59
Siblings	decrease Weight: 0.36 , rate Weight: 0.33 , gain Weight: 0.33 , proportion Weight: 0.32 , savings Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in population	1.00
be bad in population	0.95
be in human population	0.93
be in population responsible for decline in population	0.93
is population growth	0.92
be in human population responsible for decline in population	0.91
be in population responsible for decline in animal population	0.91
be in human population responsible for decline in animal population	0.89
be in population responsible	0.88
be in population responsible for decline	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(decrease, be bad in population)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(rate, is population growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(rate, is population growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(rate, is population growth)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(decrease, be bad in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(decrease, be bad in population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(increase, be in population)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in population)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(increase, be in human population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in population)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(increase, be in population responsible for decline in animal population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(increase, be in population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(rate, is population growth)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(decrease, be bad in population)