induction: be important for organisations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for organisations 1.00
be important in counselling 0.97
be important in organisation 0.97
is important cipd 0.95
be important in work 0.89
be important to us 0.86
be important to life 0.83
be important to things 0.83
was important for men in shakespeares time 0.83
was important for men 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(combustion, be important to us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to things)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important to things)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(diffusion, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important to things)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(combustion, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(combustion, be important to us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, be important to things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(induction, be important for organisations)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(induction, be important in organisation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(induction, is important cipd)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, is important cipd)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(induction, is important cipd)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(induction, is important cipd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be important to things)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important to things)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(combustion, be important to us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(induction, be important for organisations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)