induction: be important in organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in counselling 1.00
be important in organisation 1.00
be important for organisations 0.97
is important cipd 0.97
be important in work 0.91
be important to us 0.87
be important to things 0.85
be important to life 0.85
be important in business 0.84
be important in process 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to things)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(combustion, be important to us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important to things)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(diffusion, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important to things)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to things)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, be important to things)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(combustion, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(combustion, be important to us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(induction, be important in organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for organisations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(induction, is important cipd)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(induction, is important cipd)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(induction, be important for organisations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(induction, is important cipd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for organisations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(induction, is important cipd)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(induction, be important for organisations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(induction, be important in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be important to things)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important to things)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(combustion, be important to us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(induction, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)