induction: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be is related 0.99
be related to economics 0.76
be related to cells 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(induction, be related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(method, be is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(induction, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(induction, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(process, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(method, be is related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(intervention, be related to economics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be related)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(method, be is related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be related to cells)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(induction, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(method, be is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(induction, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(induction, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(diffusion, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(diffusion, be related to cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be related to cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(induction, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(induction, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(method, be is related)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diffusion, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diffusion, be related to cells)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(method, be is related)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(induction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)