intervention: be related to economics

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.64 , action Weight: 0.61 , function Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59
Siblings	vaccination Weight: 0.67 , surgical procedure Weight: 0.67 , exposure Weight: 0.63 , screening Weight: 0.63 , testing Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be related to economics	1.00
be related in math	0.77
be important in mathematics	0.76
be related	0.76
be in science	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(function, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(function, be important in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(factor, be related)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(function, be important in mathematics)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(factor, be related in math)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(function, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(function, be important in mathematics)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(function, be related)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(vaccination, be related)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(testing, be in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(function, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(intervention, be related to economics)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(intervention, be related to economics)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(function, be important in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(intervention, be related to economics)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(intervention, be related to economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(testing, be in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(testing, be in science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(vaccination, be related) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(vaccination, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(intervention, be related to economics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(intervention, be related to economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, be related)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(function, be important in mathematics)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(function, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(testing, be in science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(vaccination, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, be related)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(function, be important in mathematics)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(intervention, be related to economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(function, be related)