induction: is cooking

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.63 , process Weight: 0.61 , honor Weight: 0.58 , intervention Weight: 0.53 , heating element Weight: 0.53
Siblings	hydrolysis Weight: 0.32 , combustion Weight: 0.31 , diffusion Weight: 0.31 , recognition Weight: 0.31 , award Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is cooking	1.00
is cooking good	0.97
is cooking better	0.95
is cooking better than gas	0.88
be in cooking native delicacies	0.82
burn out oven	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(heating element, burn out oven) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(heating element, burn out oven)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(process, be in cooking native delicacies)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(heating element, burn out oven)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(heating element, burn out oven) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(induction, is cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking better)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking better)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(induction, is cooking better)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking good)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(induction, is cooking good)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(induction, is cooking better than gas)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking better than gas)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.01

Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking better than gas)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking better than gas)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking better)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Salient(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(induction, is cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(process, be in cooking native delicacies)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(heating element, burn out oven)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(heating element, burn out oven)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.12

Typical(induction, is cooking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(process, be in cooking native delicacies)