induction: is cooking good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cooking good 1.00
is cooking better 0.97
is cooking 0.97
is cooking better than gas 0.89
be in cooking native delicacies 0.81
burn out oven 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(heating element, burn out oven) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(heating element, burn out oven)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(process, be in cooking native delicacies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(heating element, burn out oven)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(process, be in cooking native delicacies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(heating element, burn out oven) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(induction, is cooking good)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(induction, is cooking)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking better)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking better)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(induction, is cooking better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(induction, is cooking better than gas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(induction, is cooking better than gas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking better than gas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking better than gas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(induction, is cooking good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(process, be in cooking native delicacies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(heating element, burn out oven)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(heating element, burn out oven)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(induction, is cooking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(process, be in cooking native delicacies)