industry: be considered as secondary activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as secondary activity 1.00
be considered as activity 0.92
shape public activity 0.80
shape activity 0.80
be regarded as market 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(institution, shape activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(institution, shape public activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(institution, shape public activity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(institution, shape activity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(institution, shape activity)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(institution, shape public activity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(institution, shape activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(institution, shape public activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(institution, shape public activity)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(institution, shape activity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(institution, shape public activity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(institution, shape activity)