sector: be regarded as market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as market 1.00
be regarded as perfect market 0.93
affect market 0.78
be considered as backbone of economy 0.77
be considered as activity 0.76
be considered as secondary activity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sector, be regarded as market)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sector, be regarded as perfect market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sector, be considered as backbone of economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sector, be regarded as market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)