sector: be regarded as perfect market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as perfect market 1.00
be regarded as market 0.93
affect market 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as market)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sector, be regarded as market)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sector, be regarded as market)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(sector, be regarded as perfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(issue, affect market)