industry: be important to australian economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to australian economy 1.00
be in indian economy 0.87
be important to uk economy 0.85
be important to country 's economy 0.82
be important to economy 0.82
be in indian economy interdependent 0.81
be in economy 0.79
be in america 0.77
be important in africa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sector, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sector, be in economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in indian economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important to economy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aviation, be in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sector, be in indian economy)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sector, be in economy)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aviation, be in america)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(aviation, be in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(industry, be important to economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(industry, be important to economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to uk economy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(industry, be important to country 's economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(aviation, be in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sector, be in indian economy interdependent)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(industry, be important to australian economy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)