industry: be significant for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be significant for us 1.00
be important for us 0.91
be important 40 0.80
is more important 0.79
be important for country 0.78
be important to country 0.76
be important for growth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(institution, be important for growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(institution, be important for growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(institution, be important for growth)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(industry, be significant for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(institution, be important for growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(industry, be significant for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(industry, be significant for us)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(industry, be important for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(industry, be important 40)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(industry, be important for country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(industry, be important to country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(industry, be important for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important for country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, be important to country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(industry, be important to country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(industry, be important to country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(industry, be important for country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(industry, be important for country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(industry, be significant for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(institution, be important for growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(industry, be significant for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(institution, be important for growth)