information: was used before computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, explanation
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.60
Siblings historical site
Weight: 0.70
, computer database
Weight: 0.67
, remote control
Weight: 0.65
, military intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used before computers 1.00
be in computer 0.86
move around in computer 0.83
be transferred from one computer 0.82
be written in computer 0.82
be moved around within computer 0.82
be transferred from one computer to another 0.81
goes into computer 0.80
be from sensors sent to central computer 0.79
be from sensors sent to computer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(information, was used before computers)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(information, be in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(information, be in computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(information, be in computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(information, be in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(information, move around in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(information, move around in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(information, move around in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(information, move around in computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(information, goes into computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(information, goes into computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(information, goes into computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(information, goes into computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(information, be written in computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(information, be written in computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(information, be written in computer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(information, be written in computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(information, was used before computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(information, was used before computers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(information, was used before computers)