injury: be at baseball field

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blow
Weight: 0.64
, pain
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.60
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.70
, mental illness
Weight: 0.69
, wrist
Weight: 0.68
, chest pain
Weight: 0.67
, concussion
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at baseball field 1.00
be at play football 0.82
be at hockey game 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concussion, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concussion, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(concussion, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(injury, be at baseball field)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(injury, be at play football)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(injury, be at hockey game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at hockey game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(injury, be at play football)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(injury, be at hockey game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(injury, be at hockey game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(injury, be at play football)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at play football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(injury, be at baseball field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(concussion, be at hockey game)