injury: be at play football

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blow
Weight: 0.64
, pain
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.60
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.70
, mental illness
Weight: 0.69
, wrist
Weight: 0.68
, chest pain
Weight: 0.67
, concussion
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at play football 1.00
be at hockey game 0.85
be at baseball field 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(concussion, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(concussion, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(concussion, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(injury, be at play football)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(injury, be at hockey game)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at hockey game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(injury, be at baseball field)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at baseball field)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(injury, be at hockey game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(injury, be at baseball field)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(injury, be at hockey game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(injury, be at baseball field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at play football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(injury, be at play football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(injury, be at play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(concussion, be at hockey game)