insanity: be good defense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental illness
Weight: 0.61
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, defense
Weight: 0.54
, illness
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.35
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.35
, neurosis
Weight: 0.35
, psychosis
Weight: 0.35
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good defense 1.00
is defense 0.97
is good offense 0.81
be stronger than offense 0.78
has state offense 0.77
be much less-valued than offense 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(defense, is good offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(defense, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defense, has state offense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, is good offense)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, is good offense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, has state offense)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(defense, is good offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(insanity, be good defense)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(insanity, be good defense)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(defense, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(insanity, be good defense)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(insanity, be good defense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(insanity, be good defense)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(insanity, is defense)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(insanity, is defense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(insanity, is defense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(insanity, is defense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insanity, be good defense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, is good offense)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, has state offense)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, has state offense)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(insanity, be good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, is good offense)