insult: be worse than normal insults

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.63
, joke
Weight: 0.55
, excuse
Weight: 0.55
, reference
Weight: 0.54
, attack
Weight: 0.52
Siblings assault
Weight: 0.30
, laughing
Weight: 0.30
, laughter
Weight: 0.30
, pronoun
Weight: 0.29
, statement
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than normal insults 1.00
be worse than insults 0.97
do less damage than regular 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(attack, do less damage than regular)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(insult, be worse than normal insults)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(attack, do less damage than regular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(attack, do less damage than regular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(attack, do less damage than regular)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insult, be worse than normal insults)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(insult, be worse than normal insults)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(insult, be worse than insults)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(insult, be worse than insults)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(insult, be worse than insults)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(insult, be worse than insults)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(insult, be worse than normal insults)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(insult, be worse than normal insults)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(attack, do less damage than regular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(insult, be worse than normal insults)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(attack, do less damage than regular)