intel: be more popular than amd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than amd 1.00
be more expensive than amd 0.94
be better than amd 0.92
be much better than amd 0.91
be faster than amd 0.89
be better than amd for gaming 0.84
be superior to amd 0.80
is popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(john deere, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(john deere, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(john deere, is popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(samsung, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(intel, be more popular than amd)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intel, be faster than amd)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better than amd)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(intel, be much better than amd)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(intel, be superior to amd)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intel, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(intel, be much better than amd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(intel, be much better than amd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(intel, be superior to amd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(intel, be superior to amd)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(intel, be faster than amd)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(intel, be faster than amd)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(intel, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(intel, be superior to amd)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(intel, be faster than amd)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(intel, is popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(intel, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intel, be more popular than amd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(john deere, is popular)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is popular)