intel: be more expensive than amd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than amd 1.00
be more popular than amd 0.94
be better than amd 0.92
be much better than amd 0.91
be faster than amd 0.90
be better than amd for gaming 0.82
is expensive 0.81
is optane expensive 0.81
be superior to amd 0.79
be much better in terms of cpu 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(john deere, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(john deere, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(john deere, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(samsung, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(samsung, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intel, be more popular than amd)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(intel, be much better than amd)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(intel, be more popular than amd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(intel, be much better than amd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(intel, be superior to amd)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(intel, be more popular than amd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intel, be faster than amd)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(intel, be faster than amd)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(intel, be much better than amd)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(intel, be faster than amd)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(intel, be superior to amd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(intel, be faster than amd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(intel, is optane expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more popular than amd)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(intel, be superior to amd)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intel, is optane expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better than amd)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(intel, is optane expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(intel, be superior to amd)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(intel, is optane expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(john deere, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(samsung, is expensive)