intel: be much better in terms of cpu

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much better in terms of cpu 1.00
be much better in terms 0.84
be much better than amd 0.82
be better than amd 0.79
be faster than amd 0.78
be better than amd for gaming 0.76
is 5th gen cpus unpopular 0.76
is celeron bad 0.76
use little endian 0.75
be more expensive than amd 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better than amd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(intel, is celeron bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intel, be faster than amd)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(intel, is 5th gen cpus unpopular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(intel, use little endian)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(intel, be much better than amd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(intel, is celeron bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(intel, be much better than amd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(intel, be much better than amd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(intel, use little endian)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(intel, be faster than amd)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(intel, use little endian)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(intel, is 5th gen cpus unpopular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(intel, be faster than amd)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(intel, be more expensive than amd)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(intel, is celeron bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(intel, is celeron bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(intel, use little endian)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(intel, be faster than amd)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(intel, is 5th gen cpus unpopular)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(intel, is 5th gen cpus unpopular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(intel, be much better in terms of cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(intel, be much better in terms of cpu)