interest rate: rise in good economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, interest
Weight: 0.69
, rate
Weight: 0.68
, policy
Weight: 0.67
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.61
, zero
Weight: 0.58
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.56
, capital account
Weight: 0.36
, ratio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
rise in good economy 1.00
rise in economy 0.98
be important to economy 0.88
rise in recession 0.88
affect economy 0.87
have rise 0.86
need rise 0.86
be on rise 0.86
rise with inflation 0.86
rise 2018 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(policy, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rate, rise with inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(rate, have rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rate, have rise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rate, rise with inflation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(policy, affect economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rate, rise with inflation)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rate, have rise)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(policy, affect economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be on rise)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inflation, affect economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(policy, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rate, rise with inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(rate, have rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inflation, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(inflation, affect economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(inflation, be on rise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(inflation, be on rise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(interest rate, rise in good economy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(interest rate, have rise)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be important to economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise with inflation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(interest rate, affect economy)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rate, have rise)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(policy, affect economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rate, rise with inflation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(inflation, affect economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(inflation, be on rise)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rate, have rise)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(policy, affect economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rate, rise with inflation)