interest rate: rise in recession

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, interest
Weight: 0.69
, rate
Weight: 0.68
, policy
Weight: 0.67
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.61
, zero
Weight: 0.58
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.56
, capital account
Weight: 0.36
, ratio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
rise in recession 1.00
fall during recession 0.95
go up in recession 0.94
decrease during recession 0.94
be low during recession 0.94
be cut during recession 0.93
rise in economy 0.89
rise in good economy 0.88
rise with inflation 0.81
have rise 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rate, rise with inflation)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(rate, have rise)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rate, have rise)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rate, rise with inflation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rate, rise with inflation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rate, have rise)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rate, rise with inflation)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(rate, have rise)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(interest rate, rise in recession)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, go up in recession)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(interest rate, go up in recession)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(interest rate, go up in recession)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in good economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(interest rate, have rise)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rate, have rise)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rate, rise with inflation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rate, have rise)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(interest rate, rise in recession)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rate, rise with inflation)