interest: flows of are income to treasury manager

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
flows of are income to treasury manager 1.00
flows of are income 0.89
be in income 0.79
affect net cash flow 0.79
is operating cash flow 0.78
affect income 0.78
affect cash flow 0.78
be made for income tax 0.77
be much higher than investment tax 0.77
be on loans income treated in books of bank 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deduction, be made for income tax)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deduction, affect income)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect cash flow)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect cash flow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(deduction, affect income)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(deduction, be made for income tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(deduction, be made for income tax)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(deduction, affect income)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect net cash flow)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect cash flow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(deduction, be made for income tax)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(deduction, affect income)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect net cash flow)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(income tax, affect cash flow)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(interest, be on loans income treated in books of bank)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(interest, be on loans income treated in books of bank)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(interest, be on loans income treated in books of bank)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(interest, be on loans income treated in books of bank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(income tax, affect net cash flow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, affect cash flow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(deduction, affect income)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deduction, be made for income tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(income tax, affect net cash flow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, affect cash flow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(deduction, affect income)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(interest, flows of are income to treasury manager)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(deduction, be made for income tax)