income tax: be much higher than investment tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much higher than investment tax 1.00
be much higher than sales tax 0.93
is tax 0.86
is direct tax 0.85
is progressive tax 0.80
be in basic income 0.77
be in universal income 0.77
be called fixed income 0.77
be higher in countries 0.77
be more relevant than costs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income, be called fixed income)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(income, be called fixed income)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be called fixed income) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be called fixed income)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income, be called fixed income)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)