income tax: be much higher than sales tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much higher than sales tax 1.00
be much higher than investment tax 0.93
is tax 0.84
is direct tax 0.84
is progressive tax 0.78
be more relevant than costs 0.77
be higher on cars 0.77
be higher on used cars 0.77
be higher in countries 0.77
be best source for revenue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(income, is tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(income, is tax)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(income, is tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(interest, be higher on used cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(interest, be higher on used cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(income tax, is tax)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is tax)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is direct tax)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, is direct tax)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(income tax, is tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(income tax, is tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(income tax, is direct tax)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(income tax, is direct tax)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(income tax, is progressive tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(income tax, is progressive tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(interest, be higher on used cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(income, is tax)