internet: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.70
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
, network device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
Siblings web page
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.36
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
be in canada expensive 0.95
be expensive in canada 0.95
be in australia 0.87
be in australia expensive 0.85
be in australia shitty 0.84
be expensive in usa 0.83
be in australia crap 0.83
be in india work 0.82
be in australia slow 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(internet, be in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(internet, be in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(internet, be in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(internet, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(internet, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(internet, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be expensive in canada)