interrupt: be driven then polling

Property	Similarity
be driven then polling	1.00
be driven polling	0.99
be driven better then polling	0.99
be driven better polling	0.98
be driven io better then polling	0.91
be driven io better polling	0.90
be better than polling	0.90

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven polling)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven better polling)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven io better polling)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(interrupt, be better than polling)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven better then polling)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be driven io better then polling)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(interrupt, be better than polling)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(interrupt, be better than polling)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(interrupt, be driven then polling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(interrupt, be better than polling)

Parents	thing Weight: 0.59 , signal Weight: 0.51 , word Weight: 0.51 , event Weight: 0.50 , exception Weight: 0.48
Siblings	remember Weight: 0.32 , talk show Weight: 0.32 , full stop Weight: 0.32 , turn signal Weight: 0.32 , do Weight: 0.32

interrupt: be driven then polling

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible