intervention: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
be in canada now 0.98
promote change in canada 0.88
use windows xp 0.80
xp 0.79
harm mexico 0.75
be on linux 0.75
be in ukraine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(program, xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(program, xp)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, harm mexico)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, promote change in canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(program, xp)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, harm mexico)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(program, xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(intervention, be in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in canada now)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada now)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(intervention, be in canada now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada now)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(intervention, be in ukraine)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in ukraine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(intervention, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, xp)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(program, xp)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(intervention, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)