intervention: is on

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, action
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings vaccination
Weight: 0.67
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.67
, exposure
Weight: 0.63
, screening
Weight: 0.63
, testing
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is on 1.00
is keratopathy 0.80
is istqb 0.80
is x86 0.80
is life-threatening 0.80
is toupper 0.80
be in dermatomes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(exposure, is life-threatening)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(exposure, is keratopathy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(testing, is istqb)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(exposure, is keratopathy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(exposure, is keratopathy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(exposure, is life-threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(exposure, is life-threatening)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(testing, is istqb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(testing, is istqb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(intervention, is on)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(intervention, is on)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(exposure, is keratopathy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(exposure, is life-threatening)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(testing, is istqb)