testing: be in dermatomes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experiment
Weight: 0.65
, intervention
Weight: 0.61
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, practice
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings screening
Weight: 0.59
, test
Weight: 0.38
, vaccination
Weight: 0.32
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.31
, example
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in dermatomes 1.00
be bsl 0.88
be kraj 0.88
be with siccors 0.81
be important in counselling 0.78
come in early devops 0.76
is on 0.76
be important in work 0.75
remain same 0.75
be different in areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be different in areas)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intervention, is on)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(practice, be different in areas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in counselling)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(intervention, be important in work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intervention, is on)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(practice, be different in areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(test, be bsl)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(intervention, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(intervention, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(practice, be different in areas)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(intervention, is on)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(test, be bsl)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(test, be bsl)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(testing, be in dermatomes)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(testing, come in early devops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(testing, remain same)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(testing, remain same)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(testing, remain same)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(testing, come in early devops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(testing, remain same)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(testing, come in early devops)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(testing, come in early devops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(intervention, is on)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(practice, be different in areas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(test, be bsl)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(intervention, is on)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(practice, be different in areas)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(testing, be in dermatomes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(intervention, be important in counselling)