inventory: be important for management

Related concepts

Parents	document Weight: 0.61 , function Weight: 0.60 , detail Weight: 0.60 , operation Weight: 0.59 , line item Weight: 0.58
Siblings	business activity Weight: 0.32 , documentation Weight: 0.32 , distribution Weight: 0.32 , supply Weight: 0.32 , operating system Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important for management	1.00
be good management	0.94
is management	0.94
management	0.93
have needed management	0.92
have important chain management	0.86
have important managers	0.82
be important for business	0.81
have chain management	0.81
be important for marketing	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(document, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(operation, have important managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(document, is management)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(operation, have important managers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(operation, have important managers)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(document, is management)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(documentation, is management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(supply, be good management)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(document, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(inventory, be important for management)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(operation, have important managers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(inventory, be important for management)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(inventory, be important for management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(supply, be good management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(supply, be good management)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(documentation, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(documentation, is management)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(distribution, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(distribution, be important for marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(inventory, be important for management)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(inventory, have needed management)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(inventory, have needed management)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(inventory, management)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(inventory, have needed management)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(inventory, management)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(inventory, management)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(inventory, management)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(inventory, be important for business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inventory, have needed management)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for business)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(inventory, be important for business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(inventory, be important for management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(document, is management)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(operation, have important managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(supply, be good management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(documentation, is management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(distribution, be important for marketing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(document, is management)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(inventory, be important for management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(operation, have important managers)