investment: be considered volatile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered volatile 1.00
is volatile 0.97
be more volatile than bonds 0.86
be more volatile than consumption 0.85
be more volatile than output 0.84
be most volatile component of gdp 0.84
be more volatile than gdp 0.83
be considered risky 0.78
is unstable 0.77
spend more volatile than consumption spending 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, be more volatile than bonds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(investment, be considered volatile)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(investment, is volatile)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(investment, is volatile)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(investment, be more volatile than output)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(investment, be more volatile than consumption)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(investment, is volatile)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered volatile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(investment, be considered volatile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered volatile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be more volatile than bonds)