investment: spend more volatile than consumption spending

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
spend more volatile than consumption spending 1.00
be more volatile than consumption 0.92
be more volatile than output 0.84
affects people spending 0.83
be more volatile than gdp 0.83
be more volatile than bonds 0.79
be most volatile component of gdp 0.79
is volatile 0.76
be more expensive than stock 0.76
be risker than savings 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(advertising, affects people spending)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(advertising, affects people spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(advertising, affects people spending)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, be more volatile than bonds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(investment, be more volatile than consumption)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(investment, be more volatile than consumption)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(investment, be more volatile than consumption)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(investment, be more volatile than output)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(investment, be more volatile than output)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(investment, spend more volatile than consumption spending) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(advertising, affects people spending)