investment: be risker than savings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.67
, currency
Weight: 0.62
, purchase
Weight: 0.61
, stock
Weight: 0.61
, advertising
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be risker than savings 1.00
is savings 0.84
be equal to savings 0.83
be riskier than bonds 0.81
tend riskier than bonds 0.80
be consider riskier 0.79
is = savings 0.78
is lower value 0.77
have more potential for higher returns than bonds 0.77
be more expensive than preferred stock 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(investment, be risker than savings)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(investment, is savings)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(investment, be equal to savings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, is savings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(investment, be equal to savings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(investment, be consider riskier)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(investment, is = savings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(investment, is = savings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(investment, is savings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(investment, be equal to savings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(investment, be equal to savings)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(investment, be consider riskier)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(investment, is = savings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(investment, be consider riskier)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(investment, is savings)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(investment, is = savings)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(investment, be consider riskier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(investment, be risker than savings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(investment, be risker than savings)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)