io: be more profitable than android

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.56
, platform
Weight: 0.56
, operating system
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, ion
Weight: 0.53
Siblings solaris
Weight: 0.32
, unix
Weight: 0.32
, microsoft
Weight: 0.32
, linux
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more profitable than android 1.00
be more efficient than android 0.91
be better than android 0.89
be faster than android 0.88
be than android 0.88
look better than android 0.88
feel more responsive than android 0.85
be more fluid than android 0.85
be smoother than android 0.83
feel smoother than android 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(io, be more profitable than android)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(io, be than android)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(io, be than android)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(io, be more efficient than android)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(io, be more efficient than android)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(io, look better than android)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(io, be than android)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(io, be smoother than android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(io, be more fluid than android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(io, look better than android)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(io, be smoother than android)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(io, be more efficient than android)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(io, be more efficient than android)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(io, be faster than android)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(io, feel smoother than android)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(io, be better than android)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(io, look better than android)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(io, be more fluid than android)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(io, be smoother than android)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(io, feel smoother than android)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(io, look better than android)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(io, be smoother than android)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(io, feel smoother than android)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(io, be more fluid than android)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(io, be faster than android)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(io, be better than android)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(io, be faster than android)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(io, feel smoother than android)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(io, be more fluid than android)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(io, be faster than android)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(io, be better than android)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(io, be better than android)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(io, be than android)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(io, be more profitable than android)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(io, be more profitable than android) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(io, be more profitable than android)