io: look better than android

Property	Similarity
look better than android	1.00
be better than android	0.98
be than android	0.95
be faster than android	0.94
be more efficient than android	0.91
feel smoother than android	0.90
have better touch response than android	0.90
be smoother than android	0.89
keep up with android	0.89
be more fluid than android	0.89

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(io, be than android)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(io, be than android)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(io, be than android)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(io, be more efficient than android)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(io, be more efficient than android)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(io, be smoother than android)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(io, be smoother than android)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(io, be more efficient than android)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(io, be faster than android)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(io, keep up with android)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(io, be more efficient than android)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(io, be more fluid than android)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(io, be better than android)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(io, be better than android)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(io, be smoother than android)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(io, feel smoother than android)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(io, be smoother than android)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(io, feel smoother than android)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(io, be faster than android)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(io, have better touch response than android)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(io, have better touch response than android)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(io, keep up with android)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(io, feel smoother than android)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(io, keep up with android)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(io, be more fluid than android)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(io, be more fluid than android)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(io, feel smoother than android)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(io, have better touch response than android)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(io, have better touch response than android)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(io, keep up with android)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(io, be faster than android)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(io, be faster than android)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(io, be more fluid than android)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(io, be better than android)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(io, be than android)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(io, look better than android) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(io, be better than android)

Parents	os Weight: 0.56 , platform Weight: 0.56 , operating system Weight: 0.55 , thing Weight: 0.54 , ion Weight: 0.53
Siblings	solaris Weight: 0.32 , unix Weight: 0.32 , microsoft Weight: 0.32 , linux Weight: 0.32

io: look better than android

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible