italian restaurant: be used to eat spaghetti

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat spaghetti 1.00
be used to eat pasta 0.89
be used to eat lasagna 0.85
be used to eat dinner 0.85
be used to enjoy pasta 0.84
be used to eat meal 0.84
be used to eat linguini 0.84
be used to eat raviolli 0.84
be used to eat 0.84
be used to eat tasty food 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pub, be used to eat meal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pub, be used to eat meal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pub, be used to eat meal)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pub, be used to eat meal)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat linguini)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pub, be used to eat meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pub, be used to eat meal)