italian restaurant: be used to enjoy pasta

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, pub
Weight: 0.64
, shop
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, store
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pizzeria
Weight: 0.60
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to enjoy pasta 1.00
be used to eat pasta 0.96
has pasta dish on menu 0.89
be used to eat polenta 0.86
be used to eat lasagna 0.85
be used to eat spaghetti 0.84
be used to eat pizza 0.83
be used to eat tasty food 0.83
be used to enjoy sushi 0.83
be used to cook fresh pizza 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to eat pizza)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pizzeria, be used to eat pizza)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be used to eat pizza)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat pasta)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat lasagna)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat spaghetti)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to enjoy sushi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be used to eat pizza)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be used to cook fresh pizza)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to enjoy pasta)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat polenta)