jam: has quality resource

Related concepts

Parents	accompaniment Weight: 0.61 , sweet Weight: 0.60 , recipe Weight: 0.55 , product Weight: 0.54
Siblings	spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.31 , rock candy Weight: 0.31 , macaroni Weight: 0.31 , caramel Weight: 0.31 , pickle Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality resource	1.00
be sustainable resource	0.86
is quality	0.81
has quality good	0.79
has quality cost	0.77
is high quality	0.77
has quality better	0.77
has quality bad	0.76
has quality availability	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(caramel, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(macaroni, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(macaroni, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(macaroni, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(pickle, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(caramel, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(caramel, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(jam, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(jam, be sustainable resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(jam, be sustainable resource)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(jam, be sustainable resource)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(jam, be sustainable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(jam, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(macaroni, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pickle, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(jam, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(caramel, has quality good)