pickle: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, pickled food
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.60
, dish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sauerkraut
Weight: 0.56
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35
, apple pie
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
taste good 0.79
is best 0.76
be bad company work for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pickle, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, is best)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pickle, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(apple pie, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple pie, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pickle, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pickle, taste good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pickle, taste good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pickle, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pickle, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pickle, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sauerkraut, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple pie, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(pickle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)