jam: is too thick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accompaniment
Weight: 0.61
, sweet
Weight: 0.60
, recipe
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.31
, rock candy
Weight: 0.31
, macaroni
Weight: 0.31
, caramel
Weight: 0.31
, pickle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is too thick 1.00
is thick 0.92
get too hard 0.84
set too hard 0.81
is too runny 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(caramel, get too hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(caramel, get too hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(caramel, get too hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(jam, is too thick)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jam, is thick)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jam, is thick)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jam, is thick)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(jam, set too hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(jam, is too runny)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(jam, set too hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jam, is thick)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(jam, set too hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(jam, is too runny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(jam, is too runny)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(jam, is too runny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jam, set too hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jam, is too thick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jam, is too thick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(jam, is too thick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(caramel, get too hard)